In vitro human leukocyte labeling with 64Cu: an intraindividual comparison with 111In-oxine and 18F-FDG☆
Abstract
We investigated labeling human leukocytes [white blood cells (WBCs)] in vitro with copper-64 (Cu) comparing labeling efficiency, viability and stability of Cu-WBCs with 111In-oxine (In) WBCs and 18F-FDG (FDG) WBCs.
Methods
Leukocytes from 10 volunteers were labeled with Cu, In and FDG. Forty milliliters of venous blood was collected and leukocyte separation was performed according to standard methods. In-WBCs and FDG-WBCs were labeled according to published methods. For Cu-WBCs, tropolone initially was used as a single chelating agent. Because of poor intracellular Cu retention (54±4% at 3 h and 24±5% at 24 h), the fluorinated, membrane-permeable divalent cation chelator quin-MF was added. WBCs were incubated in 5 ml saline containing 100 μl of 1mM quin-MF/AM in 2% dimethyl sulfoxide and 74–185 MBq Cu-tropolone for 45 min at 37°C. Labeling efficiencies; in vitro cellular viabilities at 1, 3 and 24 h; and in vitro stabilities at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 24 h (except FDG-WBCs) were determined.
Results
Mean Cu-WBCs (87±4%) and In-WBCs (86±4%) labeling efficiencies were comparable and were significantly higher than FDG-WBCs (60±19%, P<.001). Cell viabilities, similar at 1 h, were significantly higher for 64Cu-WBCs at 3 and 24 h. Intracellular retention of activity was always significantly higher for In-WBCs than for Cu-WBCs and FDG-WBCs. At 24 h, intracellular retention was 88±4% for In-WBCs and 79±6% for Cu-WBCs.
Conclusion
Cu-WBC labeling efficiency and viability were comparable or superior to In-WBCs and significantly higher than FDG-WBCs. Although significantly more activity eluted from Cu-WBCs than from In-WBCs, Cu-WBC probably is adequate for imaging. These data suggest that further investigation of in vitro copper-64-labeled leukocytes for PET imaging of infection is warranted.
Keywords: 64Cu, 18F-FDG, 111In-oxine, Infection imaging, Labeled leukocytes, PET
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This work was supported in part by NIH Grant #5RO1GM 071324-20.
PII: S0969-8051(09)00079-1
doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.03.001
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
