Melanoma imaging using 111In-, 86Y- and 68Ga-labeled CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH☆
Abstract
Introduction
A novel alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analog CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH, which targeted the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1-R) overexpressed on melanoma cells, was investigated for its biodistribution and tumor imaging properties.
Methods
The metal bifunctional chelator CHX-A″ was conjugated to the melanoma targeting peptide (Arg11)CCMSH and cyclized by Re incorporation to yield CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was labeled with 111In, 86Y and 68Ga, and the radiolabeled peptides were examined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing mice for their pharmacokinetic as well as their tumor targeting properties using small animal SPECT and PET.
Results
The radiolabeling efficiencies of the 111In-, 86Y- and 68Ga-labeled CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH peptides were >95%, resulting in specific activities of 4.44, 3.7 and 1.85 MBq/μg, respectively. Tumor uptake of the 111In-, 86Y- and 68Ga-labeled peptides was rapid with 4.17±0.94, 4.68±1.02 and 2.68±0.69 %ID/g present in the tumors 2 h postinjection, respectively. Disappearance of radioactivity from the normal organs and tissues was rapid with the exception of the kidneys. Melanoma tumors were imaged with all three radiolabeled peptides 2 h postinjection. MC1-R-specific uptake was confirmed by competitive receptor blocking studies.
Conclusions
Melanoma tumor uptake and imaging was exhibited by the 111In-, 86Y- and 68Ga-labeled Re(Arg11)CCMSH peptides, although the tumor uptake was moderated by low specific activity. The facile radiolabeling properties of CHX-A″-Re(Arg11)CCMSH allow it to be employed as a melanoma imaging agent with little or no purification after 111In, 86Y and 68Ga labeling.
Abbreviations: α-MSH, alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, CHX-A″, N-(2-aminoethyl)-trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N′,N″-pentaacetic acid, Re(Arg11)CCMSH, [Re(Cys3,4,10), d-Phe7, Arg11]α-MSH3-13, NDP, [Nle4, d-Phe7]α-MSH
Keywords: Melanoma, Imaging, α-MSH, Peptide, CHX-A″
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ The authors would like to acknowledge support from the National Cancer Institute P50-103130, R24 CA86307, the NIH Clinical Biodetective Graduate Training Grant R90DK071510 and the Harry S. Truman Veterans Administration Hospital Biomolecular Imaging Center, Columbia, MO, USA. Small animal PET imaging was supported by an NIH/NCI SAIRP grant (R24 CA86060) with additional support from the Small Animal Imaging Core of the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Hospital. The SAIC is supported by an NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA91842. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
PII: S0969-8051(09)00007-9
doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.01.007
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
