Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 5 , Pages 571-577, July 2008

Alginate moulding: an empirical method for magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography co-registration in a tumor rat model

  • Denis Rommel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Jorge Abarca-Quinones

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Nicolas Christian

      Affiliations

    • Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Frank Peeters

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Max Lonneux

      Affiliations

    • Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Daniel Labar

      Affiliations

    • Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Anne Bol

      Affiliations

    • Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Vincent Gregoire

      Affiliations

    • Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Thierry Duprez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Received 30 January 2008; received in revised form 27 March 2008; accepted 3 April 2008.

Abstract 

Background and Purpose

In the experimental field of animal models, co-registration between positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data still relies on non-automated post-processing using sophisticated algorithms and software developments. We assessed the value of an empirical method using alginate moulding for PET-MR co-registration in a tumor rat model.

Methods

Male WAG/RijHsd rats bearing grafted syngenic rhabdomyosarcoma were examined under general anesthesia by MRI using a clinical whole-body 3-T system equipped with a sensitivity-encoding four-channel wrist coil and by a small animal PET system using labelled [18F]-fluorocholine as tracer. An alginate mould including a system of external fiducials was manufactured for each animal, allowing strict immobilization and similar positioning for both modalities. Fourteen rats (27 tumors) had only one MR/PET imaging session. Five rats (9 tumors) had a similar MR/PET session before and 3 days after external radiation therapy (13 Gy in one fraction) using the same mould. Co-registration was performed using the Pmod release 2.75 software (PMOD Technologies, Ltd., Adliswil, Switzerland) with mutual information algorithm.

Results

The manufacture of the alginate moulds was easy and innocuous. Imaging sessions were well tolerated. PET-MR co-registration based on mutual information was perfect at visual examination, which was confirmed by the superimposition of external fiducials on fused images. Reuse of the same mould for the post-therapeutic session was feasible 3 days after the pre-therapeutic one in spite of tumor growth.

Conclusion

The empirical method using alginate moulding with external fiducials for PET-MR co-registration in a rodent tumor model was feasible and accurate.

Keywords: Alginate moulding, PET, MRI, Tumor rat model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0969-8051(08)00078-4

doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.04.002

Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 5 , Pages 571-577, July 2008