Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 401-411, May 2008

Radiolabeled bombesin analogs for prostate cancer diagnosis: preclinical studies

  • Bluma Linkowski Faintuch

      Affiliations

    • Radiopharmacy Center, Institute of Energetic and Nuclear Research, Sao Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +55 11 38169252; fax: +55 11 38120253.
  • ,
  • Rodrigo Teodoro

      Affiliations

    • Radiopharmacy Center, Institute of Energetic and Nuclear Research, Sao Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • ,
  • Adriano Duatti

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44100, Italy
  • ,
  • Emiko Muramoto

      Affiliations

    • Radiopharmacy Center, Institute of Energetic and Nuclear Research, Sao Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • ,
  • Salomao Faintuch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
  • ,
  • Charles J. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Missouri University Research Reactor, and Radiopharmaceutical Sciences Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, The Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO 65201, USA

Received 22 July 2007; received in revised form 17 February 2008; accepted 28 February 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

Radionuclide imaging can be a useful tool for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Bombesin (BBN) is a molecule with high affinity for gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) receptors which are over-expressed in that tumor. This report compares 99mTc-HYNIC-βAla-BBN(7-14)NH2 [99mTc-HYNIC-BBN] and 99mTc≡N(PNP6)-Cys-βAla-BBN(7-14)NH2 [99mTcN(PNP6)-Cys-BBN] with regard to labeling procedures as well as in vitro and in vivo evaluation (biodistribution and scintigraphic imaging).

Methods

Peptide synthesis was performed in an automated peptide synthesizer. HYNIC-BBN was radiolabeled with pertechnetate using tricine and ethylenediamine diacetic acid (EDDA) as coligands. Cys- BBN was radiolabeled in a two-step procedure with the preparation of the precursor 99mTc-Nitrido first and then introducing diphosphine (PNP6). Radiochemical evaluation of conjugates, as well as studies of stability, transchelation toward cysteine, and partition coefficient were done. Biological studies included internalization, biodistribution in healthy animals and in animals bearing PC3 cancer cells with acquisition of images from the tumor-bearing animals.

Results

Both complexes showed a high radiochemical yield along with good stability. Biodistribution studies pointed out strong renal excretion for the former complex due to its hydrophilic profile and marked hepatobiliary excretion for the latter, corresponding to observed lipophilicity. Tumor uptake was higher for 99mTc-HYNIC-BBN and the same occurred with internalization findings, which exceeded those of 99mTcN(PNP6)-BBN. Blocking studies in mice bearing PC-3 tumor cells revealed significantly reduced pancreas and tumor uptake, demonstrating receptor specificity of the conjugates.

Conclusion

The best radiotracer was 99mTc-HYNIC-BBN on the basis of high radiochemical yield, fast radiolabeling procedure without need for a purification step, and more consistent tumor uptake.

Keywords: Bombesin analogs, technetium 99m (99mTc)-HYNIC-BBN, Prostate cancer, 99mTcN(PNP6)-Cys-BBN

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0969-8051(08)00067-X

doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.02.005

Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 401-411, May 2008